| Can Morocco Save the Middle East? |
![]()
In Barack Obama's speech to the Muslim world in Egypt, he spoke at great length about the
importance of America's role in reaching peace in the Middle East between the Israelis and the Palestinians. The sentiment is no doubt genuine, but it's unclear to many Americans and Muslims alike just how he plans to get there. Whatever road his administration plans to take, it should go through Morocco. While Obama was in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, I was traveling in Casablanca, Marrakech, Rabat and the Western Sahara with the Institute on Religion and Public Policy, meeting with Muslim and Moroccan religious and political leaders, and speaking with average citizens about their expectations of Obama in easing tensions between the West and Muslims abroad. While it was clear Muslims there have a great respect for Obama, and look to him to advance a foreign policy that benefits the Muslim world, they were also skeptical of his rhetoric, which many considered to be lacking in detail. Dr. Ahmed Abaddi, the Secretary General of the Oulema council and head of the government commission of Islamic scholars for the Rabat region, admitted the issues facing Muslims everywhere are complex and serious. Offering "respect," he said, was symbolic. The time has come for real leadership and action. Morocco can play a significant role in brokering peace between the Israelis and Palestinians, if Obama is willing to give it a microphone. A progressive Muslim country with both African and European influences, it is strategically located to be a centerpiece of Western-Muslim dialogue. King Mohammed VI, at only 46, represents the kind of moderate and progressive world views on which Obama and the Western world should capitalize and promote as a formidable and open-minded new brand of Islam. Under Mohammed VI, Morocco has become increasingly more democratic. It is a safe haven for religious freedom, the likes of which most Arab countries have never seen. In 2000 he was awarded an honorary degree by George Washington University for his promotion of democracy in Morocco. The King has significantly advanced the causes of women's rights, freedom of the press and the rule of law. In Morocco, women can vote, drive, obtain a divorce, and hold positions of authority, thanks largely to a new family code, the Mudawana, which was initiated by the King. The Mourchidat at the Dar al-Hadith al-Hassania in Rabat are the Islamic world's only female clerics, a program started by the King in 2004 that its director Muhammad Mahfudh calls a "rare experiment in the Muslim world." But most importantly, the King holds unique authority among both Israelis and Palestinians as a credible and honest broker in engaging a dialogue between the two. As a direct descendent of the Prophet -- along with Jordan's King Abdullah II he is one of only two world leaders in Muhammad's lineage -- he possesses an authenticity within the Muslim world that sets him apart as a fairly unimpeachable conduit of Islam. Because of this lineage, Palestinians trust and respect him, even despite his efforts to promote a more liberal Muslim democracy, which has earned him the condemnation of more radical Islamic fundamentalists. And as an advocate for security in Israel, he's earned the favor of many Jewish leaders who see him as perhaps one of the only moderate Arab leaders who recognize its legitimacy. As Joe Grieboski, president of the Institute on Religion and Public Policy said, "The King has an intimate relationship with Israel, politically, culturally, historically and demographically. His father, King Hassan II, called for Israel to be a part of the Arab League and partners in the peace negotiations. He has Israel's respect." As King he is Commander of the Faithful, but King Mohammed VI has positioned himself as commander of all faiths, and not just Islam, which signals to Christians and Jews (and Morocco itself has a decent population of both) that he is open-minded and a natural conduit between the three faiths. "His position is clear," said Grieboski. "He wants security for Israel and dignity for the Palestinians. If the West focuses on these two principles, as he has, the mission has a useful clarity and direction." And there are other measures, according to Grieboski, that President Obama could and should take to show -- and not just talk about -- respect for the Islamic world. By installing a special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, as President George W. Bush did, and making it statutory, he would signal America's ongoing commitment to engaging in useful dialogue, as well as give the US a forum in which to lay forth our own goals. Because King Mohammed VI is the literal embodiment of Islam, and simultaneously promotes a Western and democratic world view, Morocco is uniquely positioned to offer the kind of insight on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that America -- and in particular Barack Obama -- desperately needs. While we should continue to play an integral role in establishing peace in the Middle East, the aid of a third party like Morocco would be invaluable. Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both met with Mohammed VI during their terms to gain insight into the Middle East crisis, and Bush in particular relied on Morocco to promote a more democratic and progressive brand of Islam to the rest of the Arab world. When Barack Obama took office, King Mohammed VI wrote him a letter, suggesting the ways in which the president could help to communicate better with the Muslim world. As of yet, there's been no response. After chiding the US on its poor listening skills, to the dismay of many thoughtful leaders before him, it seems the perfect opportunity to seek the advice of someone better qualified than he is to navigate through the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In his speech in Cairo, Obama rightly pointed out that Morocco was the first country to recognize America as an independent nation. Perhaps Obama would be wise to repay the favor, and recognize Morocco as an important delegate in advancing Middle East peace.
S.E. Cupp is co-author of "Why You're Wrong About the Right" (Simon & Schuster, 2008). She is a columnist, published in the New York Daily News, Washington Post, Townhall, Newsmax, Slate, Sports Illustrated, Human Events, American Spectator, and others. She is a political commentator and regularly appears on FOXNews and CNN.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 841
Comments (12)
![]()
Moroccan Patriot
said:
|
|
Hey Zaki, What about Mellilia and Sebta? The fact that you take the side of the zionists is comical. Israel is a terrorist sponsering apartheid theocracy that sells the organs of murdered Palestinian children to rich Israelis without the knowledge nor consent of the poor masacared children. You will probably never hear about this, but simply google the arrests of 3 mayors, 5 Rabii's and several charity heads on July 22nd in New Jersey and you will understand what your Hero Israeli's are really about. Now we move onto to the redicilous statement you made,"Have you also lost your land? Is that the reason you sympathized with the Palestinians."... As a true Moroccan patriot, I believe that Sebta and Mellilia are in fact a part of Morocco under the occupation of Spain. So to answer your question, Area's of Morocco are still being occupied by Spain. As Moroccans we share a kindred spirit with the Palestinian struggle. However, I do not want to make saints out of the Palestinian Leadership. Mahmoud Abbass is clearly a traitor to his own people, and nothing more than a dog on the leash of his zionist handlers. The people who could really lead the Palestinians out of their sorry state have been murdered or long since emigrated to other countries... kind of a pattern in the Arab world outside of Morocco. Do not throw stones from glass houses brother. Do not mistake the zionists as friends. They are racists of the first order. The funny thing is that Israel has actually managed to do more harm and damage to its closest ally the United States, than it will ever do to the Palestinians. |
Zaki
said:
|
hmimarmadoush: Shame of myself? is that right.... "You have to be ashamed of yourself..." Now that's a order I have not heard in ages since I left the land of misguided wisdom and tyranny of the herd mentality .. just because I disagree with you does not give you the right to tell people that they should be ashamed of themselves. I guess if I was there in front of you in person shame will come by you insulting me and kicking be... Is that right? Have you also lost your land? Is that the reason you sympathized with the Palestinians. You are stupid to suggest that I do not know what it feels like to loose your land... I guess you have lost some of it yourselves in the Guish lands of Morocco or the estates of the Haouz...right?.. If you have so much of it why dont you give them some of it to work with in the meantime they negociate peace of Israel... I think it is fair than letting them there in destitude situation. The palestinians are the only ones who can solve their problems...that's all I have claimed, I am for a two state solution. As for the liberation of all of muslim land of Palestine from the evil Zionist entity which you, I guess, advocate, I am not entirely with you on this.... |
Hmimarmad
said:
|
... I usually critique the content but this time I am going to make the exception, you ought to be ashamed of yourself Mr Zaki blaming the Palestinians and using the Israeli lingo that that the Palestinian leaders are the cause of all of this. Even the US is asking the Israelis to get out of the occupied territories and you are blaming the victims? That is simply shameful and disgusting. Easy for you to blame the Palestinians because you were lucky no one took over your country. |
Ash-lah
said:
|
Absurd! When Obama was asked about the breathe of the expected new presidential family dog; he replied :" ...so he must be a Mutt like me" . He referred to the mix breed of the dog and his race using the same terminology (mutt). Some dog an horse owners still use this Arian categorization and breathe Animals in search of a pure lineage, Obama has clearly scored a big point with many animal lovers and family with little children that we all know love animals. HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO THIS ARTICLE? YOU MAY ASK I say every time these so-called Morocco- Advocates and friends, wants to sale the Monarchy to the western world , they use this racist overtone of "Direct Lineage" to the Prophet of Islam. I am wondering if they are really not in touch with what Moroccans believe and what the west should hear or they are merely repeating what they have heard, even though they know it will not resonate with the American public. Do you really think that a population that elected a "Mutt" to the highest office in land will tolerate this notion of pure blood lineage to Mohamed, Moses, Jesus, Bouda or Mickey Mouse. |
Zaki
said:
|
Rejectionism explained I have noticed that all the comments were negative in terms of the Ms. Cupps intention to tell us how Morocco can play a role in leading the way out of the sluggish road map to peace. However, I see a BIG difference between my view point and the rest of commentators. My focus is NOT on pressuring Israel for concessions but on putting the ball in the court of the palestinians themselves. It is only them that can solve the problem and not Morocco or anyone else arab/muslim country.... Morocco does not have land occupied by Israel nor does it have have the right to suggest what each party should do in terms of concessions.. Morocco should stay away and leave the palestinians solve their own problems...Besides palestianians do not want to be told what to do anyway... It has become easy to blame Israel and the West for what the palestinians have endured all this times through their corrupt leaders and naive solution to the problem... These leaders have been able to highjack all the peace possibilities and chose to make wars and sustain the adversarial position towards Israel.... The Average Moroccan does not even have a job to feed his family but finds time to go to the streets to scream bloody zionist state after the recent Hamas instigated Israeli intrusion into Gaza this past Winter.... Now that's commitment to the palestinian people... a commitment which I prefer to call a misguided commitment..... Until the palestinians want peace (real peace) instead of lands and more lands to be cleared out for them to blunder and turn into desert of destitution and tyranny, I would say let them decide their fate alone and hopefully they can liberate their land... |
MBoarder
said:
|
2 Eager 2 Plz Ups: Very well written; great form Downs: Content and substance- If this piece were a person auditioning for American Idol, Simone Cowell’s comments would have be: “an utter nightmare, a complete waste of time, absolutely horrendous, and borderline delusional” |
casawi
said:
|
... This government cheerleader journalist has no clue of what she is talking about. But you know what, these kind of stories do sell well in America :) |
Zaki
said:
|
The palestinians ARE the only brokers of their OWN peace not the KING or anyone else. Ms. Cupp, You are naive to suggest that Morocco CAN be great player in brokering peace between the Palestinians and Israelis.... Not even the late king Hassan II could have done so despite he early leaning towards recognition of Israel... The well known rapprochement of Morocco and Israel is a fact and an asset for Morocco and Israel but for the Palestinian conflict this rapprochement is a liability for the king... Major arabs countries and even the large proportion of the Moroccan populace is against it ... Thus the problem is that Morocco CAN broker a peace deal is NOT WANTED by the conservative arab states and the vast majority of the Arab/Muslim population.... Unless the king has a popular support to do so, your naive idea that it can play a role is fruitless and mushy.... The fact is that he will never have support from HIS people ... He better stays cool and stays away from this issue and leave it for the Palestinians themselves to sort it out....He knows very well it is too hot to handle if he wants to stay adored by his people..... |
Elmahdi Oummih
said:
|
The author of this piece is a true FOX/CNN Journalist The fact that the person who wrote this claims to be a journalist should explain everything you would ever want to know about how journalism died in America. When Newspapers like the Post and Daily news eventually go out of business, and broadcast news channels like CNN and FOX ask themselves how they managed to lose such a large market, they can simply thank Ms.Cupp... or is that two girls one cup? |
Slawi
said:
|
Talk is cheap I find the article written by S.E Cupp misleading, full of contradictions moreover dishonest. It remind me the "mechoui diplomacy" when some foreign reporters goes on a trip to La Mamounia Morocco on the expenses of the makhzen and goes back to their homeland to write articles rewarding and acclaiming the leader. In respect to the Middle East and to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Obama speech in Cairo was more a hot air than anything else. Obama's rhetoric is lacking actions on the ground. The occupation of Palestinian territories and the settlements continues on daily basis, Gaza still under siege,West Bank still under occupation, the israeli prisons still full of Palestinians, Guantanamo is still open....etc... I believe the israeli government under the extremists Netanyahu and liebermann are just buying time and they are not willing or seeking to have peace with their neighbours. Why should they? when they have a well equipped and powerful army, when they have nukes and they're getting over $3 billions from the american taxpayers each year, moreover they have a bunch arab dictators surrounding them with a major concern is to save their power. If Obama is really serious about the two state solution, I believe he should start by putting pressure on the Israeli government by linking the American aid and guaranteed loans provided to the state of Israel to the progress made in the peace process. However, I'm skeptical and the reason is I don't think that the Obama has the gutt to face the powerful Israeli lobby in Washington, and therefore jeopardizing its chances to get reelected in 2012. Thank you for reading my comment. Slawi |
Hmimarmad
said:
|
... "Bush in particular relied on Morocco to promote a more democratic and progressive brand of Islam to the rest of the Arab world." Really? That's news to us. As far as we know the CIA relied on the DST to do the dirty work for them. Most of us only know that Bush relied on Morocco to torture the Gitmo prisoners before retuning them to Gitmo for more torture, We also know that Bush got the help of the Moroccan secret service to interrogate the so called terrorists in Gitmo. We also know that Morocco's current Islam is not a liberal especially when Bush Asked Morocco to liberalize its Islam. As a matter of fact, we see more chadours, more veils, more beards, more people telling others how they should conduct their life and the life of others. |
MBoarder
said:
|
... This article is fuuny : ) I am serious. Saddam claimed he was a descendent of the prophet too. I would not be surprised if Gaddafi makes that same claim one day or any other Arab leader for that matter. Who is going to argue otherwise especially if a “proof” is presented? This piece is full of holes and signs of cluelessness about the Middle East and its culture. If it is representative of the western understanding of the nature of the conflict in the Middle East, then no wonder the conflict is not yet resolved. |



hile MoroccoBoard.com encourages discussion on all subjects, including sensitive ones, the comments posted are solely the views of those submitting them. MoroccoBoard.com does not necessarily endorse or agree with the ideas, views, or opinions voiced in these comments. This is a moderated forum. Comments deemed abusive, offensive, or those containing profanity may not be published.










